8RR8← All audits

Audit Report

drhus/ai-auditor

35addea1c2f9 · ran in 32.4s · bundle e0d08dd8

Deterministic · 15 ambiguous skipped
Complete audit →

Overall score

2.5 /4

Partial

Risk class

HIGH

1

Code passed

24 / 45

Attestation Yes

2 / 2

Outstanding ext.

1

Overall completion status
Code findings on the left; user-attested external evidence on the right.
45

CODE-CHECKED CLAUSES

  • Strong15
  • Adequate9
  • Partial9
  • Inadequate6
  • Absent6
2

ATTESTATION QUESTIONS

  • Yes2
  • No0
  • Not Applicable0
  • Outstanding0

Harm

Don't hurt people

2.2/4

Partial

Truth

Don't deceive people

2.2/4

Partial

Responsibility

Don't abuse power

2.7/4

Adequate

Order

Don't destabilize society

3.0/4

Adequate

1 outstanding external confirmations — required for a complete Annex IV dossier. Complete now →

Safety

Don't harm people
2.7/4Adequate6 clauses
PARTIAL
Risk management system established, implemented, documented EU AI Act, Art 9
skip
2/3 rules

2/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.55 (2/3 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
100%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
RISK_REGISTER.md
presence_of_risk_register
View on GitHub →
SECURITY.md
presence_of_threat_model
View on GitHub →

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • ci_eval_gates
INADEQUATE
Resilience to errors, faults, inconsistencies EU AI Act, Art 15(4)
0/3 rules

1/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.16 (0/3 rules matched).

Confidence
81%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8QXXNMC85QQY8RV5.json:90
langchain_import
View on GitHub →
nippet": "import os from langchain.callbacks.streaming_stdout import StreamingStdOutCallbackHandler from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI"
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8QXXNMC85QQY8RV5.json:90
langchain_import
View on GitHub →
dOutCallbackHandler from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI", "rule": "langchain_import" }, { "f

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • error_handling_at_tool_boundaries
  • retry_logic
  • fallback_behaviour
ADEQUATE
Risks and benefits to people identified NIST AI RMF, Art MAP 3.4
2/2 rules

3/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.80 (2/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
80%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
RISK_REGISTER.md
presence_of_risk_register
View on GitHub →
SECURITY.md
presence_of_threat_model
View on GitHub →
STRONG
AI risk assessment process ISO/IEC 42001, Art 6.1
2/2 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (2/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
60%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
RISK_REGISTER.md
presence_of_risk_register
View on GitHub →
RISK_REGISTER.md
risk_assessment_methodology_documented
View on GitHub →
PARTIAL
Operational planning and control ISO/IEC 42001, Art 8.1
skip
1/2 rules

2/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.50 (1/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
100%
Evidence · 1 hit— click to view code
RUNBOOK.md
presence_of_runbook
View on GitHub →

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • presence_of_ci_workflows
STRONG
Data protection impact assessment (DPIA) GDPR, Art 35
1/1 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (1/1 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
55%
Evidence · 1 hit— click to view code
DPIA.md
presence_of_dpia
View on GitHub →

Privacy

Respect boundaries
1.6/4Partial6 clauses
ABSENT
Untargeted facial image scraping for face databases EU AI Act, Art 5(1)(e)
1/1 rules

0/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (1/1 rules matched).

Confidence
55%
Evidence · 6 hits— click to view code
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:32
biometric_terms
View on GitHub →
" description: "Biometric ID, categorisation, emotion recognition" - signal: critical_infra_signals category: "2" description:
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:62
biometric_terms
View on GitHub →
otion recognition / biometric categorisation" - signal: agent_framework # any interactive AI is in scope paragraph: "50(1)"
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:231
biometric_terms
View on GitHub →
calls (mediapipe, face_recognition, dlib, opencv haar cascade). score_mapping: { pass_default: 4, fail_on_match: 0 } remediation_h
package-lock.json:3913
scraping_pattern
View on GitHub →
"^1.1.0", "@playwright/test": "^1.51.1", "babel-plugin-react-compiler": "*", "react": "^18.2.0 || 19.0.0-rc-de68d2f4
package-lock.json:3923
scraping_pattern
View on GitHub →
}, "@playwright/test": { "optional": true }, "babel-plugin-react-compiler": { "optional":

…and 1 more.

ABSENT
Emotion recognition in workplace and education EU AI Act, Art 5(1)(f)
1/1 rules

0/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (1/1 rules matched).

Confidence
55%
Evidence · 6 hits— click to view code
src/pipeline/stages/recon.ts:348
emotion_terms
View on GitHub →
ms", pattern: /\b(?:emotion_detect|emotion_recognition|sentiment_score|affect_recognition|facial_emotion|micro_expression)\b/gi }, // ---
src/pipeline/stages/recon.ts:348
emotion_terms
View on GitHub →
\b(?:emotion_detect|emotion_recognition|sentiment_score|affect_recognition|facial_emotion|micro_expression)\b/gi }, // ----- data_io ----
src/pipeline/stages/recon.ts:348
emotion_terms
View on GitHub →
emotion_recognition|sentiment_score|affect_recognition|facial_emotion|micro_expression)\b/gi }, // ----- data_io ----- { signal: "data_
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8M7ZDZ6TDM5MTGT9.json:1001
employment_terms
View on GitHub →
ppet": "OMMANDS for candidate in tokens[index + 1:]: if candidate in {\"|\", \";\", \"&&\", \"||\"}: break f", "rule": "employme
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8M7ZDZ6TDM5MTGT9.json:1001
employment_terms
View on GitHub →
ens[index + 1:]: if candidate in {\"|\", \";\", \"&&\", \"||\"}: break f", "rule": "employment_terms" }, {

…and 1 more.

EXTERNAL
Real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces EU AI Act, Art 5(1)(h)
EXT

Why we flagged it

Deployment context (public space, real-time, law enforcement use, judicial authorisation) is operational, not knowable from code. Always external.

Confidence
100%
ABSENT
Data and data governance practices documented EU AI Act, Art 10
0/3 rules

0/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.10 (0/3 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
75%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
package-lock.json:3913
scraping_pattern
View on GitHub →
"^1.1.0", "@playwright/test": "^1.51.1", "babel-plugin-react-compiler": "*", "react": "^18.2.0 || 19.0.0-rc-de68d2f4
package-lock.json:3923
scraping_pattern
View on GitHub →
}, "@playwright/test": { "optional": true }, "babel-plugin-react-compiler": { "optional":

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • presence_of_data_card
  • data_loading_code_quality
  • bias_evaluation_present
STRONG
Privacy risk of the AI system evaluated NIST AI RMF, Art MEASURE 2.8
2/2 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (2/2 rules matched).

Confidence
60%
Evidence · 7 hits— click to view code
regulations/nist-ai-rmf-1.0.yaml:290
pii_redaction_present
View on GitHub →
description: "Code redacts or hashes PII before logging or sending to external models" - rule: privacy_documentation weig
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8M7ZDZ6TDM5MTGT9.json:817
pii_redaction_present
View on GitHub →
p \"$SCRIPT_DIR/mcp/redaction.js\" \"$TARGET_ABS/mcp/\" cp \"$SCRIPT_DIR/mcp/lib/\"*.js \"$TARGET_ABS/mcp/lib/\" rm -rf \"$TARGET_ABS/mcp/li
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8M7ZDZ6TDM5MTGT9.json:826
pii_redaction_present
View on GitHub →
t the proof needed, redact sensitive data, and report responsibly.</p></div> </div> </div> <div class=\"foot\"><span", "rule": "
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8M7ZDZ6TDM5MTGT9.json:835
pii_redaction_present
View on GitHub →
h MCP, which writes redacted audit metadata and egress information.</p> </div> <div class=\"code-card\"> <div", "rule": "pii_red
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8M7ZDZ6TDM5MTGT9.json:844
pii_redaction_present
View on GitHub →
n>Audited requests, redacted URLs, visible egress</span></div> </section> <section class=\"slide\" data-title=\"Egress\"> <", "r

…and 2 more.

STRONG
Data protection by design and by default GDPR, Art 25
2/2 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (2/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
60%
Evidence · 6 hits— click to view code
src/pipeline/anchor.ts:149
pseudonymisation_or_anonymisation
View on GitHub →
crypto.createHash("sha256")
src/pipeline/loader.ts:416
pseudonymisation_or_anonymisation
View on GitHub →
crypto.createHash("sha256")
src/pipeline/stages/recon.ts:315
pseudonymisation_or_anonymisation
View on GitHub →
redact
src/pipeline/stages/report.ts:64
pseudonymisation_or_anonymisation
View on GitHub →
crypto.createHash("sha256")
PRIVACY.md
default_minimal_data_collection
View on GitHub →

…and 1 more.

Transparency

Don't deceive people
2.3/4Partial7 clauses
STRONG
Subliminal techniques distorting behaviour EU AI Act, Art 5(1)(a)
0/1 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.00 (0/1 rules matched).

Confidence
55%

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • detect_manipulative_prompt_patterns
INADEQUATE
Transparent operation and instructions for use EU AI Act, Art 13
1/3 rules

1/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.25 (1/3 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
90%
Evidence · 3 hits— click to view code
README.md
readme_quality
View on GitHub →

2 required sections present

README.md
output_interpretation_guidance
View on GitHub →
README.md
limitations_section_present
View on GitHub →

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • output_interpretation_guidance
  • limitations_section_present
INADEQUATE
Users informed they are interacting with an AI EU AI Act, Art 50(1)
1/2 rules

1/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.20 (1/2 rules matched).

Confidence
80%
Evidence · 1 hit— click to view code
README.md
ai_disclosure_in_user_facing_strings
View on GitHub →

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • ai_disclosure_in_user_facing_strings
ADEQUATE
AI-generated content marked as such, machine-readable EU AI Act, Art 50(2)
2/2 rules

3/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.82 (2/2 rules matched).

Confidence
78%
Evidence · 8 hits— click to view code
.agent/docs/analysis-tiers.md:102
c2pa_or_watermark
View on GitHub →
ent provenance | no c2pa imports → ABSENT | "API response contains `aiGenerated:true` / C2PA header" | | GDPR Art 5(1)(c) — PII in logs | gr
.agent/docs/analysis-tiers.md:102
c2pa_or_watermark
View on GitHub →
aiGenerated:true` / C2PA header" | | GDPR Art 5(1)(c) — PII in logs | grep `user.email` near `logger.info` | "fake PII sent → grep all captu
.agent/docs/llm-judge-policy.md:78
c2pa_or_watermark
View on GitHub →
` | 50(2) | **1** | C2PA / watermark library imports | | `art-50/p3-emotion-biometric-disclosure` | 50(3) | **1** | Deterministic disclosure
.agent/docs/pipeline-design.md:75
c2pa_or_watermark
View on GitHub →
ovenance_hooks` | C2PA, watermarking, content labelling | Article 50(2) synthetic content disclosure
.agent/docs/regulations-matrix.md:63
c2pa_or_watermark
View on GitHub →
o/text) | C | C2PA / watermarking libraries; metadata writers; output post-processing. | | 50(3) | Emotion-recognition / biometri

…and 3 more.

ABSENT
Emotion recognition / biometric categorisation disclosure EU AI Act, Art 50(3)
0/1 rules

0/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.00 (0/1 rules matched).

Confidence
55%
Evidence · 1 hit— click to view code
README.md
emotion_or_biometric_disclosure_string
View on GitHub →

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • emotion_or_biometric_disclosure_string
ADEQUATE
Deepfake content labelled as artificially generated EU AI Act, Art 50(4)
skip
1/1 rules

3/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.70 (1/1 rules matched).

Confidence
85%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
.agent/docs/analysis-tiers.md:102
c2pa_or_watermark
View on GitHub →
ent provenance | no c2pa imports → ABSENT | "API response contains `aiGenerated:true` / C2PA header" | | GDPR Art 5(1)(c) — PII in logs | gr
.agent/docs/analysis-tiers.md:102
c2pa_or_watermark
View on GitHub →
aiGenerated:true` / C2PA header" | | GDPR Art 5(1)(c) — PII in logs | grep `user.email` near `logger.info` | "fake PII sent → grep all captu
STRONG
Principles relating to processing of personal data GDPR, Art 5
2/2 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (2/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
60%
Evidence · 3 hits— click to view code
PRIVACY.md
presence_of_privacy_policy
View on GitHub →
PRIVACY.md
purpose_limitation_documented
View on GitHub →
README.md
purpose_limitation_documented
View on GitHub →

Auditability

Actions must be traceable
2.1/4Partial8 clauses
INADEQUATE
Technical documentation drawn up before placing on market EU AI Act, Art 11
1/3 rules

1/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.15 (1/3 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
80%
Evidence · 1 hit— click to view code
README.md
readme_quality
View on GitHub →

2 required sections present

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • presence_of_model_card
  • architecture_docs
PARTIAL
Automatic recording of events over the lifetime EU AI Act, Art 12(1)
skip
1/3 rules

2/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.58 (1/3 rules matched).

Confidence
100%
Evidence · 8 hits— click to view code
scripts/seed-audit.ts:38
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
x.ts"), content); console.log(` rewrote index.ts (${entries.length} seeds)`); } async function main() { const args = process.argv.slic
scripts/seed-audit.ts:64
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
-1.0"], }; console.log(`\n=== ${owner}/${repo} (id=${input.auditId}) ===`); const t0 = Date.now(); try { const report
scripts/seed-audit.ts:68
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
evt.kind === "log") console.log(` [${evt.stage}] ${evt.text}`); else if (evt.kind === "stage") console.log(` [${evt.stage}] phase=
scripts/seed-audit.ts:69
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
t.kind === "stage") console.log(` [${evt.stage}] phase=${evt.phase}${evt.durationMs ? ` (${evt.durationMs}ms)` : ""}`); else if (ev
scripts/seed-audit.ts:70
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
= "classification") console.log(` ✦ risk=${evt.classification} annex=${evt.annexIii.join("/")} art50=${evt.art50.join("/")}`); else

…and 3 more.

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • structured_logging_imported
  • logging_persistent_sink
ADEQUATE
Logging ensures traceability appropriate to risk EU AI Act, Art 12(2)
skip
2/3 rules

3/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.68 (2/3 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
98%
Evidence · 8 hits— click to view code
scripts/seed-audit.ts:38
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
x.ts"), content); console.log(` rewrote index.ts (${entries.length} seeds)`); } async function main() { const args = process.argv.slic
scripts/seed-audit.ts:64
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
-1.0"], }; console.log(`\n=== ${owner}/${repo} (id=${input.auditId}) ===`); const t0 = Date.now(); try { const report
scripts/seed-audit.ts:68
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
evt.kind === "log") console.log(` [${evt.stage}] ${evt.text}`); else if (evt.kind === "stage") console.log(` [${evt.stage}] phase=
scripts/seed-audit.ts:69
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
t.kind === "stage") console.log(` [${evt.stage}] phase=${evt.phase}${evt.durationMs ? ` (${evt.durationMs}ms)` : ""}`); else if (ev
scripts/seed-audit.ts:70
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
= "classification") console.log(` ✦ risk=${evt.classification} annex=${evt.annexIii.join("/")} art50=${evt.art50.join("/")}`); else

…and 3 more.

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • logs_include_request_id
INADEQUATE
Context of use established and understood NIST AI RMF, Art MAP 1.1
skip
1/2 rules

1/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.30 (1/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
90%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
README.md
readme_quality
View on GitHub →

2 required sections present

README.md
output_interpretation_guidance
View on GitHub →

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • deployment_context_documented
PARTIAL
Post-deployment monitoring, appeal and override, change management NIST AI RMF, Art MANAGE 4.1
skip
2/4 rules

2/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.50 (2/4 rules matched).

Confidence
100%
Evidence · 7 hits— click to view code
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:817
human_in_loop
View on GitHub →
in-the-loop hooks: `human_input()`, interrupt nodes in LangGraph, approval-gate functions, manual- review flags, con
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:838
human_in_loop
View on GitHub →
For LangGraph: use `interrupt()` nodes. For custom flows: build an approval-queue pattern. Document where humans can intervene i
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:902
ic: - rule: kill_switch_present weight: 0.7 description: | Code contains a documented kill-switch /
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:906
sm (function named `kill_switch`, `emergency_stop`, `disable_agent`, a feature flag with explicit disable, an admin
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:906
med `kill_switch`, `emergency_stop`, `disable_agent`, a feature flag with explicit disable, an admin endpoint that h

…and 2 more.

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • feedback_capture_present
  • structured_logging_imported
ADEQUATE
Documented information for the AI management system ISO/IEC 42001, Art 7.5
skip
1/2 rules

3/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.70 (1/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
90%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
README.md
presence_of_versioned_docs
View on GitHub →
CHANGELOG.md
docs_changelog_present
View on GitHub →

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • presence_of_versioned_docs
INADEQUATE
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation ISO/IEC 42001, Art 9.1
1/2 rules

1/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.25 (1/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
85%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
scripts/seed-audit.ts:38
structured_logging_present
View on GitHub →
x.ts"), content); console.log(` rewrote index.ts (${entries.length} seeds)`); } async function main() { const args = process.argv.slic
scripts/seed-audit.ts:64
structured_logging_present
View on GitHub →
-1.0"], }; console.log(`\n=== ${owner}/${repo} (id=${input.auditId}) ===`); const t0 = Date.now(); try { const report

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • presence_of_eval_suite
STRONG
Records of processing activities GDPR, Art 30
1/1 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (1/1 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
55%
Evidence · 1 hit— click to view code
PROCESSING_REGISTER.md
presence_of_processing_register
View on GitHub →

Accountability

Don't abuse power
2.8/4Adequate6 clauses
PARTIAL
Deployer log-retention capability supported EU AI Act, Art 26(6)
skip
1/1 rules

2/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.50 (1/1 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
100%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
scripts/seed-audit.ts:38
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
x.ts"), content); console.log(` rewrote index.ts (${entries.length} seeds)`); } async function main() { const args = process.argv.slic
scripts/seed-audit.ts:64
log_at_tool_boundary
View on GitHub →
-1.0"], }; console.log(`\n=== ${owner}/${repo} (id=${input.auditId}) ===`); const t0 = Date.now(); try { const report
STRONG
Risk management process documented and accountable NIST AI RMF, Art GOVERN 1.4
2/2 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (2/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
60%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
RISK_REGISTER.md
presence_of_risk_register
View on GitHub →
RISK_REGISTER.md
risk_owner_assignment
View on GitHub →
ABSENT
Ongoing monitoring and periodic review of risk management NIST AI RMF, Art GOVERN 1.5
0/2 rules

0/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.00 (0/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
60%

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • ci_eval_gates
  • drift_monitoring_present
ADEQUATE
Leadership and commitment for AI management ISO/IEC 42001, Art 5.1
skip
1/2 rules

3/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.70 (1/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
90%
Evidence · 1 hit— click to view code
AI_POLICY.md
presence_of_ai_policy
View on GitHub →

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • leadership_signoff_evidence
STRONG
Roles, responsibilities and authorities ISO/IEC 42001, Art 5.3
1/1 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (1/1 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
55%
Evidence · 1 hit— click to view code
CODEOWNERS
presence_of_raci_or_owners
View on GitHub →
STRONG
Internal organization controls ISO/IEC 42001, Art A.5
1/1 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (1/1 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
55%
Evidence · 1 hit— click to view code
CODEOWNERS
presence_of_codeowners
View on GitHub →

Human Oversight

Humans stay in control
2.6/4Adequate5 clauses
PARTIAL
Effective human oversight designed and built-in EU AI Act, Art 14(1)
skip
1/3 rules

2/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.50 (1/3 rules matched).

Confidence
100%
Evidence · 6 hits— click to view code
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:817
human_in_loop
View on GitHub →
in-the-loop hooks: `human_input()`, interrupt nodes in LangGraph, approval-gate functions, manual- review flags, con
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:838
human_in_loop
View on GitHub →
For LangGraph: use `interrupt()` nodes. For custom flows: build an approval-queue pattern. Document where humans can intervene i
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8QXXNMC85QQY8RV5.json:162
human_in_loop
View on GitHub →
import ( AIMessage, HumanMessage,", "rule": "langchain_import" }, { "file": "gpt_engineer/core/a
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8QXXNMC85QQY8RV5.json:171
human_in_loop
View on GitHub →
import ( AIMessage, HumanMessage, SystemMessage, messages_from_dict, messages_", "rule": "langchain_import" },
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8QXXNMC85QQY8RV5.json:198
human_in_loop
View on GitHub →
chain.schema import HumanMessage, SystemMessage from termcolor import colored from gpt_engineer.core.ai import", "rule": "langch

…and 1 more.

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • oversight_ui_present
  • tool_calls_have_dry_run
ADEQUATE
Interrupt / stop function reachable by overseer EU AI Act, Art 14(4)(d)
skip
1/2 rules

3/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.70 (1/2 rules matched).

Confidence
90%
Evidence · 6 hits— click to view code
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:902
ic: - rule: kill_switch_present weight: 0.7 description: | Code contains a documented kill-switch /
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:906
sm (function named `kill_switch`, `emergency_stop`, `disable_agent`, a feature flag with explicit disable, an admin
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:906
med `kill_switch`, `emergency_stop`, `disable_agent`, a feature flag with explicit disable, an admin endpoint that h
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:907
stop`, `disable_agent`, a feature flag with explicit disable, an admin endpoint that halts processing). - ru
regulations/nist-ai-rmf-1.0.yaml:342
ic: - rule: kill_switch_present weight: 0.6 - rule: feature_flag_for_disable weight: 0.4 descr

…and 1 more.

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • graceful_shutdown_handler
PARTIAL
Ability to override / reverse the system's output EU AI Act, Art 14(4)(e)
skip
1/2 rules

2/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.60 (1/2 rules matched).

Confidence
100%
Evidence · 6 hits— click to view code
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:817
human_in_loop
View on GitHub →
in-the-loop hooks: `human_input()`, interrupt nodes in LangGraph, approval-gate functions, manual- review flags, con
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:838
human_in_loop
View on GitHub →
For LangGraph: use `interrupt()` nodes. For custom flows: build an approval-queue pattern. Document where humans can intervene i
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:902
ic: - rule: kill_switch_present weight: 0.7 description: | Code contains a documented kill-switch /
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:906
sm (function named `kill_switch`, `emergency_stop`, `disable_agent`, a feature flag with explicit disable, an admin
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:906
med `kill_switch`, `emergency_stop`, `disable_agent`, a feature flag with explicit disable, an admin endpoint that h

…and 1 more.

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • decisions_are_addressable
PARTIAL
Mechanisms to supersede or deactivate AI systems NIST AI RMF, Art MANAGE 2.3
skip
1/2 rules

2/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.60 (1/2 rules matched).

Confidence
100%
Evidence · 6 hits— click to view code
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:902
ic: - rule: kill_switch_present weight: 0.7 description: | Code contains a documented kill-switch /
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:906
sm (function named `kill_switch`, `emergency_stop`, `disable_agent`, a feature flag with explicit disable, an admin
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:906
med `kill_switch`, `emergency_stop`, `disable_agent`, a feature flag with explicit disable, an admin endpoint that h
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:907
stop`, `disable_agent`, a feature flag with explicit disable, an admin endpoint that halts processing). - ru
regulations/nist-ai-rmf-1.0.yaml:342
ic: - rule: kill_switch_present weight: 0.6 - rule: feature_flag_for_disable weight: 0.4 descr

…and 1 more.

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • feature_flag_for_disable
STRONG
Automated individual decision-making, including profiling GDPR, Art 22
2/2 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (2/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
60%
Evidence · 12 hits— click to view code
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:817
human_review_path_present
View on GitHub →
in-the-loop hooks: `human_input()`, interrupt nodes in LangGraph, approval-gate functions, manual- review flags, con
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:838
human_review_path_present
View on GitHub →
For LangGraph: use `interrupt()` nodes. For custom flows: build an approval-queue pattern. Document where humans can intervene i
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8QXXNMC85QQY8RV5.json:162
human_review_path_present
View on GitHub →
import ( AIMessage, HumanMessage,", "rule": "langchain_import" }, { "file": "gpt_engineer/core/a
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8QXXNMC85QQY8RV5.json:171
human_review_path_present
View on GitHub →
import ( AIMessage, HumanMessage, SystemMessage, messages_from_dict, messages_", "rule": "langchain_import" },
src/data/seed-audits/aud_01KRQE8QXXNMC85QQY8RV5.json:198
human_review_path_present
View on GitHub →
chain.schema import HumanMessage, SystemMessage from termcolor import colored from gpt_engineer.core.ai import", "rule": "langch

…and 7 more.

Fairness

Treat people fairly
3.0/4Adequate4 clauses
STRONG
Exploiting vulnerabilities (age, disability, socio-economic) EU AI Act, Art 5(1)(b)
0/1 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.00 (0/1 rules matched).

Confidence
55%

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • detect_protected_attribute_targeting
STRONG
Social scoring leading to detrimental treatment EU AI Act, Art 5(1)(c)
0/1 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.00 (0/1 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
55%

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • detect_scoring_with_persistent_user_state
ABSENT
Predictive policing solely from profiling EU AI Act, Art 5(1)(d)
1/1 rules

0/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.76 (1/1 rules matched).

Confidence
79%
Evidence · 6 hits— click to view code
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:199
law_enf_terms
View on GitHub →
crime-likelihood / recidivism / "risk to commit X" scores when the input contains only person profile data (no obje
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:202
law_enf_terms
View on GitHub →
names like `crime_risk`, `recidivism_score`, `offender_likelihood` combined with profile inputs. score_mapping: { pa
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:202
law_enf_terms
View on GitHub →
recidivism_score`, `offender_likelihood` combined with profile inputs. score_mapping: { pass_default: 4, fail_on_match: 0 }
src/pipeline/stages/recon.ts:330
law_enf_terms
View on GitHub →
ms", pattern: /\b(?:crime_risk|recidivism|offender_likelihood|police_dispatch|criminal_record|sentencing_recommend)\b/gi }, // ----- migr
src/pipeline/stages/recon.ts:330
law_enf_terms
View on GitHub →
n: /\b(?:crime_risk|recidivism|offender_likelihood|police_dispatch|criminal_record|sentencing_recommend)\b/gi }, // ----- migration_signa

…and 1 more.

STRONG
Biometric categorisation by protected attributes EU AI Act, Art 5(1)(g)
0/1 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.00 (0/1 rules matched).

Confidence
55%

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • detect_biometric_categorisation_by_protected_attrs

Security & Governance

Don't destabilize society
3.0/4Adequate4 clauses
ADEQUATE
Cybersecurity measures appropriate to circumstances EU AI Act, Art 15(5)
3/4 rules

3/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.80 (3/4 rules matched).

Confidence
90%
Evidence · 12 hits— click to view code
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:344
prompt_injection_defence
View on GitHub →
(hallucination, prompt injection, output bias, leakage, capability escalation), mitigation owner, status. Wire eval suite into CI
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:1121
prompt_injection_defence
View on GitHub →
ic: - rule: prompt_injection_defences weight: 0.4 description: | Code includes prompt-injection miti
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:1124
prompt_injection_defence
View on GitHub →
Code includes prompt-injection mitigations: output filters, input sanitisation, instruction-data segregation, system-promp
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:1135
prompt_injection_defence
View on GitHub →
Eval suite includes prompt-injection / adversarial cases" score_mapping: ">=0.85": 4 ">=0.65": 3 ">=0.40": 2 ">=
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:1143
prompt_injection_defence
View on GitHub →
hint: | Add a prompt-injection eval set (e.g. from `promptbench`, `garak`, or your own canonical injection prompts). Sanitise to

…and 7 more.

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • adversarial_eval_present
PARTIAL
Security and resilience evaluated NIST AI RMF, Art MEASURE 2.7
skip
2/3 rules

2/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.60 (2/3 rules matched).

Confidence
100%
Evidence · 12 hits— click to view code
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:344
prompt_injection_defence
View on GitHub →
(hallucination, prompt injection, output bias, leakage, capability escalation), mitigation owner, status. Wire eval suite into CI
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:1121
prompt_injection_defence
View on GitHub →
ic: - rule: prompt_injection_defences weight: 0.4 description: | Code includes prompt-injection miti
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:1124
prompt_injection_defence
View on GitHub →
Code includes prompt-injection mitigations: output filters, input sanitisation, instruction-data segregation, system-promp
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:1135
prompt_injection_defence
View on GitHub →
Eval suite includes prompt-injection / adversarial cases" score_mapping: ">=0.85": 4 ">=0.65": 3 ">=0.40": 2 ">=
regulations/eu-ai-act-2024-08.yaml:1143
prompt_injection_defence
View on GitHub →
hint: | Add a prompt-injection eval set (e.g. from `promptbench`, `garak`, or your own canonical injection prompts). Sanitise to

…and 7 more.

Suggested fix · we looked for these and found none

  • adversarial_eval_present
STRONG
Resources for AI systems ISO/IEC 42001, Art A.7
2/2 rules

4/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 1.00 (2/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
60%
Evidence · 2 hits— click to view code
SECURITY.md
presence_of_security_policy
View on GitHub →
package-lock.json
dependency_pinning
View on GitHub →
ADEQUATE
Security of processing GDPR, Art 32
2/2 rules

3/4

Why we flagged it

Composite raw score 0.80 (2/2 rules matched). Supporting docs may exist outside the repo.

Confidence
80%
Evidence · 6 hits— click to view code
scripts/seed-audit.ts:60
encryption_at_rest_or_transit
View on GitHub →
https://github.com/${owner}/${repo}`,
src/app/a/[chain]/[id]/_agent-audit.tsx:87
encryption_at_rest_or_transit
View on GitHub →
https://github.com/owner/repo
src/app/api/audit/run/route.ts:38
encryption_at_rest_or_transit
View on GitHub →
https://github.com/${body.source.owner}/${body.source.repo}`,
src/app/api/audit/stream/route.ts:54
encryption_at_rest_or_transit
View on GitHub →
https://github.com/${body.source.owner}/${body.source.repo}`,
next.config.ts
encryption_at_rest_or_transit
View on GitHub →

…and 1 more.